Donald Trumps racial comments about Hispanic judge in Trump University case. Condemnation of comments made by Donald Trump about a federal judge reached the heights of the national Republican leadership when U. S. House Speaker Paul Ryan rebuked the GOPs presumptive presidential nominee on June 7, 2. BibMe Free Bibliography Citation Maker MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. Street Law Textbook 8Th Edition' title='Street Law Textbook 8Th Edition' />I disavow these comments, the Wisconsin Republican said. Claiming a person cant do the job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment. I think that should be absolutely disavowed. Its absolutely unacceptable. Trump has been roundly denounced, by the leftand right, for saying U. Plantation+Colonies+Cont..jpg' alt='Street Law Textbook 8Th Edition' title='Street Law Textbook 8Th Edition' />S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel may be biased against him because of his Mexican heritage. The judge is presiding over a pair of cases in which the plaintiffs allege Trump University duped them into paying tens of thousands of dollars on the belief they would be trained to learn Trumps real estate strategies. Trump denies the allegations, saying the students got their moneys worth, with many offering positive evaluations of the program. Curiel, who was appointed to the federal bench in San Diego by President Barack Obama, was born and raised in Indiana. His parents were naturalized U. S. citizens from Mexico. So, what exactly did Trump say to draw so much denunciation Time for In Context, the feature we use to flesh out sound bites that get widespread attention. On June 2, 2. 01. Trump told the Wall Street Journalthat Curiel had an absolute conflict in presiding over the litigation given that he is of Mexican heritage and a member of a Latino lawyers association. Street Law Textbook 8Th Edition' title='Street Law Textbook 8Th Edition' />Daily paper. Local, state, and wire news and commentary. Photo galleries, business and obituaries. When Trump said in a separate interview that Curiel is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro Mexican in referfence to the group, Politi. Fact National rated his statement Mostly False. Trump told the journal the judges background was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U. S. border. Im building a wall. Its an inherent conflict of interest, Trump said. But Trump expanded on those comments during two Sunday talk show interviews that aired June 5, 2. Here are the relevant excerpts. CBS Face the Nation. This was the exchange about the judge between Trump and host John Dickerson on CBS Face the Nation. The interview was recorded on June 3, 2. Dickerson Let me ask you about, what does the Mexican heritage of the judge in the Trump University case have to do with anythingTrump I think it has a lot to do with it. Accounting Software For Option Trading. First of all, Ive had terrible rulings forever. I had a judge previous to him and it would have been a very quick case. This is a case I shouldve won on summary judgment. This is a case and nobody writes this, and they all know it, but they dont like to write it the plaintiff in the case was a woman. She was so bad that under deposition it was over. I mean, she couldnt have been the it was a disaster. They went before the judge, they said, We dont want her to be the plaintiff. We want to put somebody else in. So we said, Well, thats fine. Dismiss the case. You have to dismiss the case. Wait a minute she gave letters, the most incredible reviews of the college youve ever seen, of the university. She gave the most incredible then on top of it, we have a tape where shes talking about it in the most glowing terms. You wouldnt speak about your college                                    Dickerson But Mr. Trump, what does this have to do with his parents being from Mexico, how does that    Trump Excuse me, excuse me, Im just saying. Were getting terrible rulings. We go to the judge, we say to the judge, Hey, you cant let her out of the case. He let her out of the case. We said, Well, if youre going to let her out of the case, shes the plaintiff. If youre going to let her out of the case, the case is over. No, the case isnt over. O n January 27, 2012, the Wall Street Journal ran an Opinion Editorial written by 16 people who deny the evidence of humaninduced climate change. Each MindTap product offers the full, mobileready textbook combined with superior and proven learning tools at one affordable price. Students who purchase digital. Luke Plunkett. Luke Plunkett is a Contributing Editor based in Canberra, Australia. He has written a book on cosplay, designed a game about airplanes, and also runs. OK Now Dickerson Give me the thought process, though, why how does this work Trump He has given me my thought process Dickerson No, no, for him, how do his Mexican parents have to do with him not ruling for youTrump He is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro Mexican, which is all fine. But I say hes got bias. I want to build a wall. Im going to build a wall. Im doing very well with the Latinos, with the Hispanics, with the Mexicans, Im doing very well with them, in my opinion. And were going to see, youre going to see, because you know what, Im providing jobs. Nobody else is giving jobs. But just so you understand, this judge has treated me very unfairly, hes treated me in a hostile manner. And theres something going on. When a woman can be a plaintiff in a case and then say, I dont want to be and you know why they dont want to be a plaintiffThey dont want her, the lawyers asked that she not be a plaintiff because they would have lost the case immediately. Dickerson So, Im trying to figure out your thinking here, though. If his Mexican heritage the fact that his parents were Mexican immigrants is a barrier to him doing his job,why would any Mexican voter vote for youWouldnt they be the same barrier same problem Trump No. Theyre going to vote for me because Im going to bring jobs into the country Dickerson But isnt it the same problem Because you want the wall and all of that Trump No, totally different. Dickerson then asked Trump what if the judge on the case were Muslim. After some back and forth about that and immigration, attention returned to the judge and race. Dickerson Isnt there sort of a tradition, though, in America that we dont judge people by who their parents were and where they came fromTrump Im not talking about tradition Im talking about common sense, OK Hes somebody, hes proud of his heritage. And I think thats great that hes proud of his heritage. Dickerson But youre saying its a barrier to him doing his job. Trump Well, hes not treating me hes not treating me fairly. Dickerson And you think its not because you think its because of where his parents came fromTrump Ive had numerous lawyers. Look, I have a case where thousands of people have said it was a great school. Theyve written reviews where they say its a great school. Not a good school, like great. They gave it the highest marks. I have thousands of these papers. It shouldve been a summary judgment case, meaning the case shouldve been dismissed. And I had a judge who was very fair. I have a lawyer that came in when he came in. I mean, the lawyer, on the other side, sort of entered the case when he entered the case, and were trying to figure out what thats all about. Dickerson Would you have your lawyers say, Hey, throw this out because the judge is Trump Well, I may do that now were finding things out now that we didnt know before Dickerson Because of his Mexican heritage, though Trump No, but because of other things. I mean because of other things. Dickerson Youve said you want to reopen Trump How do you allow a case to proceed when the plaintiff asks to be dismissed from the caseThe plaintiff, the one that brought the suit, said, I dont want to sue anymore. I dont want to sue anymore. They didnt want to sue. You know why they didnt want to Because she cant win the case. Because she was a disaster. So the lawyers want her dismissed from the case. They go before the judge and he lets her out Well, he can let her out, but you have to dismiss the case. Law Wikipedia. Lady Justice, a goddess symbolising justice who bears a sword symbolising the coercive power of a tribunal, scales representing an objective standard by which competing claims are weighed and a blindfold indicating that justice should be impartial and meted out objectively, without fear or favor and regardless of money, wealth, power or identity. Law is a system of rules that are created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior. Law as a system helps regulate and ensure that a community show respect, and equality amongst themselves. State enforced laws can be made by a collective legislature or by a single legislator, resulting in statutes, by the executive through decrees and regulations, or established by judges through precedent, normally in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals can create legally binding contracts, including arbitration agreements that may elect to accept alternative arbitration to the normal court process. The formation of laws themselves may be influenced by a constitution, written or tacit, and the rights encoded therein. The law shapes politics, economics, history and society in various ways and serves as a mediator of relations between people. A general distinction can be made between a civil lawjurisdictions, in which a legislature or other central body codifies and consolidates their laws, and b common law systems, where judge made precedent is accepted as binding law. Historically, religious laws played a significant role even in settling of secular matters, and is still used in some religious communities. Islamic Sharia law is the worlds most widely used religious law, and is used as the primary legal system in some countries, such as Iran and Saudi Arabia. The adjudication of the law is generally divided into two main areas. Criminal law deals with conduct that is considered harmful to social order and in which the guilty party may be imprisoned or fined. Civil law not to be confused with civil law jurisdictions above deals with the resolution of lawsuits disputes between individuals or organizations. Law provides a source of scholarly inquiry into legal history, philosophy, economic analysis and sociology. Law also raises important and complex issues concerning equality, fairness, and justice. Definition. Mainstream definitions. Numerous definitions of law have been put forward over the centuries. The Third New International Dictionary from Merriam Webster5 defines law as Law is a binding custom or practice of a community a rule or mode of conduct or action that is prescribed or formally recognized as binding by a supreme controlling authority or is made obligatory by a sanction as an edict, decree, rescript, order, ordinance, statute, resolution, rule, judicial decision, or usage made, recognized, or enforced by the controlling authority. The Dictionary of the History of Ideas published by Scribners in 1. A legal system is the most explicit, institutionalized, and complex mode of regulating human conduct. At the same time, it plays only one part in the congeries of rules which influence behavior, for social and moral rules of a less institutionalized kind are also of great importance. Whether it is possible or desirable to define law. There have been several attempts to produce a universally acceptable definition of law. In 1. 97. 2, one source indicated that no such definition could be produced. Mc. Coubrey and White said that the question what is law has no simple answer. Glanville Williams said that the meaning of the word law depends on the context in which that word is used. He said that, for example, early customary law and municipal law were contexts where the word law had two different and irreconcilable meanings. Thurman Arnold said that it is obvious that it is impossible to define the word law and that it is also equally obvious that the struggle to define that word should not ever be abandoned. It is possible to take the view that there is no need to define the word law e. History. The history of law links closely to the development of civilization. Ancient Egyptian law, dating as far back as 3. BC, contained a civil code that was probably broken into twelve books. It was based on the concept of Maat, characterised by tradition, rhetorical speech, social equality and impartiality. By the 2. 2nd century BC, the ancient Sumerian ruler Ur Nammu had formulated the first law code, which consisted of casuistic statements if then. Around 1. 76. 0 BC, King Hammurabi further developed Babylonian law, by codifying and inscribing it in stone. Hammurabi placed several copies of his law code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as stelae, for the entire public to see this became known as the Codex Hammurabi. The most intact copy of these stelae was discovered in the 1. British Assyriologists, and has since been fully transliterated and translated into various languages, including English, Italian, German, and French. The Old Testament dates back to 1. BC and takes the form of moral imperatives as recommendations for a good society. The small Greek city state, ancient Athens, from about the 8th century BC was the first society to be based on broad inclusion of its citizenry, excluding women and the slave class. However, Athens had no legal science or single word for law,1. Yet Ancient Greek law contained major constitutional innovations in the development of democracy. Roman law was heavily influenced by Greek philosophy, but its detailed rules were developed by professional jurists and were highly sophisticated. Over the centuries between the rise and decline of the Roman Empire, law was adapted to cope with the changing social situations and underwent major codification under Theodosius II and Justinian I. Although codes were replaced by custom and case law during the Dark Ages, Roman law was rediscovered around the 1. Roman codes and adapt their concepts. Latin legal maxims called brocards were compiled for guidance. In medieval England, royal courts developed a body of precedent which later became the common law. A Europe wide Law Merchant was formed so that merchants could trade with common standards of practice rather than with the many splintered facets of local laws. The Law Merchant, a precursor to modern commercial law, emphasised the freedom to contract and alienability of property. As nationalism grew in the 1. Law Merchant was incorporated into countries local law under new civil codes. The Napoleonic and German Codes became the most influential. In contrast to English common law, which consists of enormous tomes of case law, codes in small books are easy to export and easy for judges to apply. However, today there are signs that civil and common law are converging. EU law is codified in treaties, but develops through the precedent laid down by the European Court of Justice. The Constitution of India is the longest written constitution for a country, containing 4. Ancient India and China represent distinct traditions of law, and have historically had independent schools of legal theory and practice. The Arthashastra, probably compiled around 1. AD although it contains older material, and the Manusmriti c. AD were foundational treatises in India, and comprise texts considered authoritative legal guidance.